Federal Controlled Substances: Imports, Exports, and Drug Offenses

Image related with this article: Federal Controlled Substances: Imports, Exports, and Drug Offenses
f you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case in the Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, Southern District of Alabama, or any federal jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit, including Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, contact Joe Ingram or Ingram Law LLC at 205-335-2640.

Federal law criminalizes a wide variety of drug offenses, with a significant number penalized under 21 U.S.C. §960. This section encompasses violations of §§825, 952, 953, 955, 957, and 959. Notably, the offenses must be committed knowingly or intentionally, requiring prosecutors to prove the necessary mens rea, or mental state, to commit the offense.

21 U.S.C. §825 is directed at labeling and packing of controlled substances. This section grants authority to the Attorney General to regulate the label for controlled substances and requires distributors to comply with the labeling requirements. Under the section, it is unlawful to distribute controlled substances without proper labeling. Containers must also contain proper warnings and be securely sealed. Manufacturers and distributors are prohibited to mislabel anabolic steroids in particular, excluding products with an approved application under §505(b) or (j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

21 U.S.C. §952 is directed towards the importation of controlled substances. Under the statute, it is unlawful to import into the United States any schedule I or II controlled substance, or any narcotic drug in schedule III, IV, or V, or ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, or phenylpropanolamine. The Attorney General has the authority to make exceptions for these substances when necessary for medical, scientific, or other legitimate purposes. Nonnarcotic controlled substances in schedule III, IV, or V is less restricted. Imports must still be for medical, scientific, or legitimate uses, and the importer must follow notification or declaration procedures as required by law.

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a conviction under §952 in United States v. Besson, No. 22-11603, 2023 WL 4580169 (11th Cir. July 18, 2023). In Besson, the defendant conspired with his codefendants to import cocaine. The scheme involved the use of paid couriers, who were enlisted to carry multiple kilograms of cocaine on commercial flights into the United States. During the course of the conspiracy, the defendant and his coconspirators transported between 5 and 15 kilograms of cocaine. Complying with the mandatory minimum sentence associated with the offense, the defendant was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment.

Federal law also criminalizes the exportation of controlled substances under 21 U.S.C. §953. Exportation of narcotic drugs in schedule I, II, III, or IV is broadly restricted. §953 provides certain exceptions to the broad illegality of controlled substance exportation, allowing export to any country which is a party to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the Convention for Limiting the Manufacture and Regulating the Distribution of Narcotic Drugs, the International Opium Convention of 1912 for the Suppression of the Abuses of Opium, Morphine, Cocaine, and Derivative Drugs, or the International Opium Convention signed in 1925. The Attorney General may also extend this recognition to countries that conform with the conventions in their system of controlling drug imports. Narcotic drugs may be exported to holders of permits or licenses from the country of import allowing the import, or when the drug is being used for medical and scientific purposes for which there is actual need. Nonnarcotic schedule I and II substances may be exported to countries where the Attorney General approves the country’s system or importing such substances, so long as the importer is properly licensed to do so. Similarly to narcotic drugs, the Attorney General may make exceptions for medical and scientific necessity. Nonnarcotic controlled substances in schedule III or IV, and any controlled substance in schedule V, are treated less strictly in an exportation context. Such substances may be exported when the importation is not unlawful in the importing country, and proper notification procedure is followed.

Compared to broader import and export laws, 21 U.S.C. §955 is narrow, targeted specifically at vessels, aircraft, and other vehicles going to and from the United States. The statute prohibits onboard possession of any schedule I or II controlled substance or any narcotic drug in schedule III or IV, with exceptions for substances that are part of the vessel’s official supplies or cargo.

21 U.S.C. §957 provides the registration requirements for parties wishing to legally engage in the importation and exportation of controlled substances. In the absence of a registration issued by the Attorney General or a statutorily recognized exception, it is unlawful to import or export any controlled substance or list I chemical. The section extends exceptions to agents and employees of registered companies, as well as contract carriers and warehousemen, so long as the import or export occurs in the usual course of business or employment. Ultimate users entering or exiting the country with controlled substances in their possession for legitimate and prescribed medical use are also exempt from the statute.

The final statute subject to the §960 penalty structed is 21 U.S.C. §959. §959 criminalizes the possession, manufacture, and distribution of controlled substances. In addition to criminalizing manufacture and distribution within the United States, the statute also prohibits distributing listed chemicals with the intent or knowledge that the listed chemical will be used to manufacture a controlled substance that will be manufactured in or unlawfully imported to the United States. The breadth of this criminalization encompasses actions taken outside of the United States’ borders, so long as the offender knows or should reasonably believe that their actions will result in a controlled substance entering the United States.

The Eleventh Circuit affirmed a sentence for violating §959 in United States v. Arias, No. 22-14254, 2024 WL 2290027 (11th Cir. May 21, 2024). In Arias, the defendant participated in a transnational drug-trafficking organization. The defendant’s role involved picking up cocaine from Colombian suppliers and coordinating shipment of the drugs into the United States. Although the defendant was not the “organizer and leader,” he played a significant role int the conspiracy, recruiting several of his codefendants to join. On appeal, the defendant’s 151-month sentence was affirmed.

When any of the aforementioned controlled substance crimes are committed, the penalty structure is provided by §960. The penalties are divided by amount, with the statute providing specific quantities of each drug. The first range of penalties applies to offenses involving 1 kilogram or more of a mixture containing heroin; 5 kilograms or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or some combination of the three substances; 280 grams or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or a combination, when the substance has a cocaine base; 100 grams or more of phencyclidine (PCP) or 1 kilogram or more of a PCP mixture; 10 grams or more of a mixture containing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); 400 grams or more of a mixture containing N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or 100 grams or more of a mixture containing any analogue of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide; 1000 kilograms or more of marijuana; or 50 grams or more of methamphetamine. Offenses involving any of the aforementioned controlled substances are punishable by a minimum of 10 years in prison, and as much as a life sentence. If the offender has a previous conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony, the minimum sentence is 15 years’ imprisonment. If the substance causes serious injury or death, the minimum sentence rises to 20 years’ imprisonment, with a mandatory life sentence if the offender has a previous serious drug felony or violent felony. These offenses also carry a fine of up to $10,000,000 for individual defendants and $50,000,000 for defendants who are not individuals. Offenders face a minimum of 5 years of supervised release following release from prison, which doubles if the offender has a prior felony conviction.

The second grouping of §960 penalties are punished less severely than the first grouping. §960(b)(2) encompasses offenses involving 100 grams or more of a mixture containing heroin; 500 grams or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or some combination of the three substances; 28 grams or more of a mixture containing coca leaves, cocaine, ecgonine, or a combination, when the substance has a cocaine base; 10 grams or more of phencyclidine (PCP) or 100 grams or more of a PCP mixture; 1 grams or more of a mixture containing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD); 40 grams or more of a mixture containing N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide or 10 grams or more of a mixture containing any analogue of N-phenyl-N-[1-(2-phenylethyl)-4-piperidinyl] propanamide; 100 kilograms or more of marijuana; or 5 grams or more of methamphetamine. Offenses in this category are punishable by anywhere from 5 to 40 years in prison, which increases to a minimum of 20 years and a maximum of life imprisonment if the substance causes death or serious injury. If the offender has a prior conviction for either a serious drug felony or serious violent felony, the sentence may range from 10 years imprisonment to life imprisonment, with the offender receiving a mandatory life sentence if death or serious injury is caused by the substance. Following release from prison, offenders face at least four years of supervised release, or eight years if the offender has a prior felony conviction. Violations involving the quantities and substances in §960(b)(2) carry a fine of up to $5,000,000 if the defendant is an individual or $25,000,000 if the defendant is not an individual.

The final category of offenses includes controlled substances in schedule I or II, gamma hydroxybutyric acid, and flunitrazepam. The penalty for these offenses, codified in §960(b)(3), is a maximum of 20 years imprisonment, which rises to a maximum of 30 years if the offender has a prior conviction for a serious drug felony or serious violent felony. If the substance causes death or serious injury, the offender faces a minimum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, and as much as life in prison. If the substance causes death or injury and the offender has a prior conviction for a serious felony, the offender faces a mandatory life sentence. Following release from prison, offenders face a minimum of three years of supervised release, which doubles if the offender has a prior felony conviction. §960(b)(3) additionally carries a fine of up to $2,000,000 for individual defendants and $10,000,000 for defendants who are not individuals.

Finally, §960(d) establishes the penalty for importation or exportation offenses broadly. An importation or exportation offense involving a list I chemical with the intention or reasonable belief that a controlled substance will be manufactured from the chemical is punishable by up to 20 years in prison. Other import and export offenses are punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

21 U.S.C. §961 provides additional penalties for violations of 21 U.S.C. §954 and failure to notify the Attorney General of importation or exportation activities under §971. §954 provides that a controlled substance in schedule I may by imported, transferred, or transshipped if the shipment was done for scientific, medical, or legitimate purposes and with prior approval of the Attorney General. Controlled substances in schedule II, III, or IV may also be imported, transferred, or transshipped if the Attorney General is given advance notice, and all regulations are followed. If the violation is committed knowingly or intentionally, the offender may be sentenced to up to one year in prison and a fine of up to $25,000. In the absence of knowledge or intent, the offender is only subjected to the fine as a civil penalty.

If you have a Federal Criminal case, a State Criminal case, a Municipal Case or a Family Law case in the Northern District of Alabama, Middle District of Alabama, Southern District of Alabama, or any federal jurisdiction in the Eleventh Circuit, including Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, contact Joe Ingram or Joe Ingram Law, LLC at 205-335-2640. Get Relief * Get Results.

articles

Blogs

1 / 44
Coach Tuberville: Governor or Outsider?

Coach Tuberville: Governor or Outsider?

Explore the legal and political questions surrounding Senator Tommy Tuberville’s 2026 bid for Alabama governor. This article examines Alabama’s residency requirements, the “carpetbagger” debate, and why Tuberville’s candidacy is likely to be decided in court.

read articles
What Gregory Hunt’s Death Says About Capital Punishment in Alabama

What Gregory Hunt’s Death Says About Capital Punishment in Alabama

Gregory Hunt’s execution in Alabama highlights major issues in the state’s capital punishment system, including the use of nitrogen gas, lengthy death row waits, and non-unanimous jury verdicts. Learn what his case reveals about the realities and controversies of the death penalty in Alabama.

read articles
Is a Child Abducted When a Parent Flees the State Before Divorce is Filed?

Is a Child Abducted When a Parent Flees the State Before Divorce is Filed?

Find out how Alabama courts define child abduction when a parent relocates with a child before divorce is filed. This article examines the recent Stanford v. Anaya decision and explains what counts as wrongful removal or retention under Alabama law.

read articles
Adams v. Atkinson: How the Alabama Supreme Court Reviews Contracts

Adams v. Atkinson: How the Alabama Supreme Court Reviews Contracts

Learn how the Alabama Supreme Court interprets contract language in Adams v. Atkinson, focusing on the legal meaning of "hold harmless" versus "indemnify." This decision provides guidance for resolving contract disputes and clarifies how courts approach ambiguous terms.

read articles
Parole In Alabama: How the Proposed Parole Guidelines May Affect You

Parole In Alabama: How the Proposed Parole Guidelines May Affect You

Learn how Alabama’s proposed parole guidelines may impact parole hearings and pardon rates. This article explains the new scoring system, what it means for inmates and their families, and how it could affect your loved one’s chance for early release.

read articles
United States v. Zayas: The Bank Secrecy Act

United States v. Zayas: The Bank Secrecy Act

Explore the United States v. Zayas decision and learn how structuring financial transactions to evade the Bank Secrecy Act’s $10,000 reporting threshold can lead to federal criminal charges. Understand the standards courts use to determine willful evasion under this law.

read articles
Can You Go to Jail for Not Paying Child Support?

Can You Go to Jail for Not Paying Child Support?

Find out if you can go to jail for not paying child support in Alabama. Learn how contempt of court works, what jail time may result, and what recent court cases reveal about your legal risks when child support payments are missed.

read articles
J.M.M v. State: When Life in Prison is Deserved

J.M.M v. State: When Life in Prison is Deserved

Discover why the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals upheld life sentences for aggravated child abuse in the case of J.M.M. v. State. Learn how courts determine when the maximum penalty is appropriate for child abuse cases involving serious physical injury.

read articles
What is and What Is not First-Degree Assault

What is and What Is not First-Degree Assault

Learn what legally qualifies as first-degree assault in Alabama, and what does not, based on recent appellate court decisions. This article explains the key elements of first-degree assault and why not all injuries involving weapons meet the legal standard for serious physical injury.

read articles
Whistleblower Lawsuits: How You Can Be a Hero & Make Millions

Whistleblower Lawsuits: How You Can Be a Hero & Make Millions

Discover how whistleblowers can expose government fraud under the False Claims Act and potentially earn millions in rewards. Learn your rights, legal options, and how to take action today.

read articles
Mulkey v. State: Appealing the Death Penalty

Mulkey v. State: Appealing the Death Penalty

Learn how Alabama appellate courts review death penalty cases and plain error claims. Mulkey v. State shows how appellate safeguards protect defendants’ rights in capital murder appeals.

read articles
Pig-Butchering: A Modern Bank Robbery

Pig-Butchering: A Modern Bank Robbery

Discover how a sophisticated "pig butchering" scam orchestrated by a Malaysian crime syndicate led to a $65 million digital heist. Learn about legal remedies, victim rights, and landmark court cases offering hope for recovering stolen cryptocurrency.

read articles
Sex Offender Restrictions: Can They Be Unconstitutional

Sex Offender Restrictions: Can They Be Unconstitutional

The Eleventh Circuit ruled a key Alabama sex offender statute unconstitutional, affirming a father’s right to live with his child. Learn how criminal appeals can protect your rights.

read articles
Juvenile Justice? The case of K.A v. State of Alabama

Juvenile Justice? The case of K.A v. State of Alabama

A look into Alabama’s juvenile justice system through the case of K.A.—examining Miranda rights, sentencing, and the court’s duty to balance justice and rehabilitation.

read articles
The Difficulties of Maintaining a Summary Judgment

The Difficulties of Maintaining a Summary Judgment

Learn how a seemingly simple legal win through summary judgment was reversed in Alonso v. Alpha Phi due to unresolved factual disputes and procedural missteps.

read articles
 The Limitations on Criminal Confessions

The Limitations on Criminal Confessions

Learn how the Corpus Delicti rule protects your rights in DUI and drug confession cases. Joe Ingram Law explains how improper police procedures can render a confession inadmissible—and help you beat your charge.

read articles
Taylor v. Humpries: A Failure of Equity and Common Sense.

Taylor v. Humpries: A Failure of Equity and Common Sense.

Explore Taylor v. Humphries, a controversial Alabama court case where a disabled U.S. citizen was denied a state ID due to bureaucratic barriers. This article examines how rigid legal formalism can undermine equity, common sense, and public trust in the justice system.

read articles
Child Custody Across State Lines

Child Custody Across State Lines

Learn how child custody jurisdiction works across state lines under the UCCJEA. Discover how Alabama courts can retain authority even after one parent relocates, and what legal rights you have when custody orders are challenged in another state.

read articles
Custodial Sexual Misconduct and The Sex Offender Registry

Custodial Sexual Misconduct and The Sex Offender Registry

Charged with custodial sexual misconduct in Alabama? Learn how a conviction can put you on the sex offender registry, what recent court cases mean for your future, and why legal reform is urgently needed.

read articles
Enforcing Arbitration Agreements Against a Third Party

Enforcing Arbitration Agreements Against a Third Party

Learn how Alabama law treats arbitration agreements in estate litigation. Discover when third parties—like executors—can be bound by a decedent’s arbitration clause.

read articles
When Can A Police Officer Use Deadly Force?

When Can A Police Officer Use Deadly Force?

Learn when a police officer can legally use deadly force under the Fourth Amendment. Explore key court rulings and constitutional standards in this high-profile Eleventh Circuit case.

read articles
Clearing Your Record in Alabama: What You Need to Know About Expungement

Clearing Your Record in Alabama: What You Need to Know About Expungement

Learn how to expunge a criminal record in Alabama. Discover eligibility rules, filing steps, costs, and how expungement can give you a fresh start. Get expert legal help.

read articles
HB247 Lulu’s Law: Irrational, But Beautiful

HB247 Lulu’s Law: Irrational, But Beautiful

Discover how Alabama’s Lulu’s Law established a shark attack monitoring and emergency alert system for the state’s coastal counties. Learn why this unique legislation, inspired by community advocacy after a tragic incident, reflects the power of local voices in shaping state policy. Explore the case’s impact, legislative background, and what it means for public safety on Alabama beaches.

read articles
Right to Counsel: When has this right been breached?

Right to Counsel: When has this right been breached?

Understand when the constitutional right to counsel applies in criminal cases. Learn from the recent Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals decision in Russell v. State about the critical stages where legal representation is required.

read articles
Can Prison Sentence Reductions Cross State Lines

Can Prison Sentence Reductions Cross State Lines

Discover whether prison sentence reductions can transfer across state lines. Learn about a key 2025 Alabama case that clarifies how correctional incentives apply when inmates move between states.

read articles
When is evidence sufficient to revoke probation?

When is evidence sufficient to revoke probation?

Learn when evidence is sufficient to revoke probation, based on a key 2025 Alabama court ruling. Understand the role of hearsay, probation violations, and legal standards in probation revocation cases.

read articles
Restitution and Evidence: When Is There Enough Evidence For Restitution

Restitution and Evidence: When Is There Enough Evidence For Restitution

Learn when restitution orders are legally valid under Alabama law. Discover why evidence and a proper hearing are essential before courts can require repayment to victims in criminal cases.

read articles
Understanding Cybercrime Charges and Digital Defense Strategies

Understanding Cybercrime Charges and Digital Defense Strategies

Facing cybercrime allegations? Learn the types of cybercrime charges, potential penalties, and how Joe Ingram Law LLC builds strong digital defense strategies. Summary Description: Explore how Joe Ingram Law LLC defends against cybercrime allegations with expert knowledge of digital forensics, hacking laws, identity theft, and data breaches.

read articles
The Interplay Between Plea Agreements and Aggravating Factors

The Interplay Between Plea Agreements and Aggravating Factors

Attorney Teresa Darwin Phillips pleaded guilty to theft, deception, and elder exploitation in Alabama. Learn how her failure to pay restitution impacted her sentencing and why the court upheld late notice of aggravating factors.

read articles
Running From The Cops: When is it 3rd Degree Felony Escape?

Running From The Cops: When is it 3rd Degree Felony Escape?

Facing charges for running from the police? Learn when fleeing becomes third-degree felony escape in Alabama and how recent court rulings may affect your case.

read articles
HB49’s Deadly Challenge Against the Supreme Court

HB49’s Deadly Challenge Against the Supreme Court

Alabama’s HB49 challenges Supreme Court precedent by proposing the death penalty for child rape. Learn how this controversial bill could reshape capital punishment law nationwide.

read articles
Default Judgment Divorce in Alabama: How Can You Avoid It?

Default Judgment Divorce in Alabama: How Can You Avoid It?

Learn how a default judgment in divorce can leave you with nothing if you don’t respond to legal filings. Discover how one Alabama court reversed such a judgment—and why immediate legal action is critical to protect your rights.

read articles
Appellate Courts: Arbiters of Justice

Appellate Courts: Arbiters of Justice

Explore how the justice system safeguards fairness through appellate review in United States v. Gregory, a federal drug trafficking case that reveals key protections for defendants and the power of appeals in correcting trial court errors.

read articles
David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

David Eugene Files and the Interplay of Ethics and Jurisdiction

In a case that made its way to the highest level of the state court system, the Alabama Supreme Court recently presided over an appeal beginning in Walker County. This case, Ex parte David Eugene Files, centers around a Rule 32 petition for postconviction relief. Files’ petition was dismissed by the Walker circuit court, with the dismissal being affirmed by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals.

read articles
Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

Sufficiency of Evidence: Reviewing the Admissibility and Application of Evidence Through US v. Mapson

In a decision that affirms the admissibility and sufficiency of several distinct types of evidence, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently presided over an appeal that found its roots in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama.

read articles
Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

Are Courts Always Free to Divide Property in a Divorce?

How courts divide real property in a divorce. Learn more from Ingram Law, LLC.

read articles
Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

Till Death Do Us Part: Marital Property Division on Behalf of an Estate

In a case that demonstrates the limits of alimony awards, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the case of Larry Shearry v. Christy Spivey, as personal representative of the Estate of Charlotte Shearry.

read articles
Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

Fultondale Alabama Municipal Courts: Charges, Penalties, and Why You Should Seek an Attorney

You are driving home late between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 3:00 a.m. You get pulled over because the police officer states you are driving over the line, driving too slow, have a head light out or you have a taillight out.

read articles
latest-news

The Crime of Stalking in Alabama

Another category of criminal offense in Alabama is stalking. Covered by Article 5, stalking includes offenses for stalking in the first and second degree, aggravated stalking in the first and second degree, and electronic stalking in the first and second degree.

read articles
Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

Navigating the Division of Marital Property: Lessons from Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown

In a case that demonstrates the intricacies of equitable division of marital property, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently presided over an appeal from the Jefferson Circuit Court in Jefferson County. The case of Barbara Brown v. Ernest Brown illustrates the importance of maintaining a clear record on appeal and emphasizes the necessity of full disclosure when dividing marital assets.

read articles
Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

Navigating Legal Challenges; Brett Yeiter’s Fight Against a Death Sentence

In a case illustrating the tumultuous and complicated proceedings for challenging a death sentence, the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals recently heard the appeal of Brett Richard Yeiter v. State of Alabama, stemming from Escambia County. Yeiter’s case underscores the critical need to adhere to procedural requirements, especially in cases involving severe sentences.

read articles
latest-news

Trademark Infringement: Causes of Action Under the Lanham Act

Federal trademark law is primarily governed by the Lanham Trademark Act, also referred to as the Trademark Act of 1946. The Lanham Act, codified in 15 U.S.C. §§1051 to 1127, covers a wide range of trademark issues including registration, maintenance, protection, and the creation of a federal cause of action for trademark infringement.

read articles
Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

Navigating the Complexities of Marital Property Division: Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr.

In a case that highlights the complex issues of marital property division during divorce proceedings, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals recently heard the appeal of Catherine S. Cauthen v. Carey Lee Cauthen, Jr. Arising from Baldwin County, this case addresses the appeals of both the husband and the wife, demonstrating the intricate nature of property classification and division through six main points of contention. If you need a Divorce Lawyer, Please contact us about your case.

read articles
The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

The Battle for Exoneration: Charles McCrory and the Fight Against Outdated Scientific Evidence

In a case that highlights broader systemic issues in the American justice system, the United States Supreme Court recently declined to review a controversial Alabama murder conviction. At this stage, the case of McCrory v. Alabama has been tumultuous for a man who continues to maintain his innocence. The increasing public attention directed towards the challenges defendants face when seeking exonerations is creating legislative pressure for reform, offering hope for a more just future.

read articles

schedule a consultation

Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo
Joe Ingram Law Logo

Your path to get the right compensation starts here.